Skip to content
SERVICE

Monitoring & Regression Testing

A recurring technical check for websites and products where ordinary releases, content changes and third-party components can reintroduce accessibility defects.


Request a scope →


Inspect example work

Monitoring & Regression Testing

What we fix

scheduled automated scans where useful

manual regression checks for selected journeys

known-issue recurrence checks

change-focused sampling

evidence register updates

release notes and escalation

Deliverables

monitoring summary

new/regressed issue list

updated evidence register

retest status

recommended repair scope

WORKFLOW

Check → Prioritise → Fix → Retest → Document → Maintain

01

Check

Inspect the agreed pages, document or workflow and capture reproducible evidence.

02

Prioritise

Separate blockers, important defects and lower-risk items so production effort is explicit.

03

Fix

Implement the agreed remediation or production changes rather than stopping at a report.

04

Retest

Repeat the relevant checks against the changed asset and record pass/fail status.

05

Document

Return issue status, evidence, limitations and a client-ready handover.

06

Maintain

Where useful, keep the baseline and check future releases for regressions.

EXAMPLE WORK

Accessibility Regression Gate for Releases

INDEPENDENT DEMONSTRATION CASE

Open a representative production case with before/after evidence, issue status and downloadable artifacts. It is demonstration work, not a client claim.


Inspect example work →

STARTING POINT

From €95 / month

After a useful baseline exists; frequency and critical journeys determine scope.


Request a scope →

Who it is for

sites with frequent content changes

SaaS products with regular releases

agencies managing multiple client sites

teams that already completed initial remediation

SCOPE NOTE

Technical production, not a legal guarantee.

Monitoring reduces the chance that known defect classes return; it is not continuous proof that every state of a changing product is conformant.

Frequently asked questions

How often should monitoring run?

It depends on release frequency and risk. Monthly or release-triggered checks are common starting points.

Is monitoring automated only?

No. Manual checks can be included for critical journeys and known regression risks.

Do you fix issues automatically?

Fixing can be a separate bounded remediation task or part of an agreed ongoing arrangement.

Do I need an initial audit first?

A baseline is strongly useful because monitoring needs something concrete to compare against.

Is this legal advice?

No. SYNTHESIS provides technical implementation, testing and documentation. Legal applicability and final legal interpretation remain with the client and their advisers.

Need the specialist production done?

Send the asset and required outcome. We will confirm scope, price, evidence and handover before production starts.


Start an agency pilot →