Representative monitoring program showing how accessibility moves from an occasional audit to a versioned release gate with explicit pass/fail evidence.
12 critical components across 6 versioned releases
Verification
Baseline comparison, keyboard smoke checks, semantic assertions, regression status and release gate
CHALLENGE
What was wrong
The agency had no stable baseline. Regressions appeared between releases, ticket acceptance was inconsistent and the client-facing status was always reconstructed manually.
Define 12 critical components and acceptance checks
Create baseline v1.0
Run the same checks against six simulated releases
Record regressions by version and owner
Retest fixed regressions
Publish one client-ready release status
VERIFIED FIXTURE RESULTS
What actually changed in the packaged evidence
CHECK
BEFORE
RESULT
Critical components in baseline
0 / 12
12 / 12
Release history with evidence
0 / 6
6 / 6
Known blockers at handover
Unknown
0
Regression status
Ad hoc
Versioned
Current release gate
Undefined
PASS
5 regressions across simulated history
found / baseline
5
resolved / produced
0 unresolved blockers in release 1.6
remaining / handover
Claim boundary: results above are measurements from the representative fixture/evidence set included with this case. They are not claimed client conversion, revenue, legal-conformance or historical-performance figures.
The agency owns the client relationship, timeline and final presentation. SYNTHESIS owns the agreed specialist production and verification. Report branding and client-contact boundaries are agreed before work starts.
What stays explicit
Scope and exclusions
Dates and rates
Testing / evidence boundary
Client-contact route
Known limitations
Retest or audit status
Have a project with the same problem?
Send the staging URL, document or procurement request. We will scope the smallest useful production job and the proof you will receive.